Kesilapan definisi dalam polisi insurans

Mula2 saya cuba tulis dalam BM tetapi disebabkan terlalu banyak terminology perubatan. Ia lebih sesuai di tulis dalam BI. Let me know in the comments if you prefer me to write in BM or BI in future articles.

I also hope this article doesn’t land me in trouble. Disclaimer: This article solely represents my personal opinion and does not reflect the views of my employer.

In the complex world of healthcare, accuracy is not just important, it’s vital. But what happens when a misclassification triggers a wave of misunderstanding? During my deep dive into health insurance policies (I sometimes do this to get familiarize with policies to assist my patients with their claims), I discovered an inaccuracy inside a critical illness policy from a leading Malaysian insurance company.

I provide the link here (which remains uncorrected as of 11 April 2024) that will lead you to “Big 3 Critical Illness Protection Plan.”

Then click on: 24 conditions (at the bottom of the screenshot) which would bring you to another page.

Look at row #6: Enhanced External Counterpulsation. The description is inaccurate and is more suited to another procedure called IABP.

Understanding EECP Therapy

EECP, or Enhanced External Counterpulsation, is an FDA-approved therapy for long-term stable chest pain, may sound complex, but its core concept is simple. It’s a non-invasive treatment typically administered in outpatient clinics, and sometimes even in shop lots. During EECP treatment, cuffs are applied to your legs to apply pressure to blood vessels, thereby enhancing blood circulation to your heart. Patients usually undergo this therapy for a total of 35 hours: one hour per day, five days a week, for seven weeks.

EECP: cuff applied to legs. Nothing is placed inside the body. She looks stable and not seriously ill.

This therapy is recommended for a specific group of patients suffering from long-term (chronic) chest pain that could limit their activities. It’s often considered when other interventions, like angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft, have been performed or aren’t feasible; or when symptoms persist despite optimal medication and/or without other therapeutic options.

However, it’s crucial to note that there is no data indicating EECP prolongs survival. Therefore, if you don’t experience any chest pain, there’s no justification for undergoing EECP.

The scientific mechanism suggests it may stimulate the development of small blood vessels supplying the heart. The American College of Cardiology currently labels it as Class IIb, backed by moderate-quality evidence (Level of evidence B) supporting its usefulness.

(Class IIb: indicates that the usefulness or efficacy of a procedure or treatment is less well established by evidence).

From: 2023 AHA/ACC Guideline for the management Chronic coronary disease.

Regrettably, there are centres in Malaysia that unethically offer EECP as a first-line therapy to clients who do not need it. And most of these clients have not undergone proper assessment and treatment by cardiologists. These centres often charge exorbitant price.

And how about IABP?

IABP, or Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump, is a medical device considered as an invasive procedure performed inside hospitals by cardiologists for unstable patients experiencing shock from a heart attack or in preparation for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

A cardiologist performing IABP in a hospital setting. The patient does not look well. Look at the face.

The procedure involves inserting a slender tube called a catheter into the aorta, the main artery leaving the heart, with a balloon at its tip. This balloon inflates and deflates in coordination with the heart’s rhythm, aiming to provide mechanical support and improve blood flow to the heart, thereby reducing the heart’s workload. It’s a lifesaving intervention for patients in critical condition, such as those experiencing cardiac shock.

The Confusion
The dilemma arises as it’s uncertain which therapy the insurance company intends to cover, whether EECP or IABP. To navigate this confusion, it’s advisable to reach out to the insurance company directly or consult with your insurance agent for clarification. So far, I have not been able to reach the company for clarification. I called them before the fasting month, but their agents have not returned my call. This article is not intended to cast a negative light on this company. I am sure it is an honest oversight which might be explained further in their full policy. And I am sure they have their own medical panel that double-checks their policies. I hope they would come across this article and amend that part.

Your homework

If you come across the term EECP or IABP in your policy with your own company, please check if a similar error takes place. You could even check with your agent for clarification; they are there to help you. The dedicated ones will definitely help you to answer any uncertainty in your policy.

Conclusion: The Way Forward

In the intricate landscape of healthcare, effective communication and accuracy are pivotal. It’s imperative for insurance companies and their agents, healthcare providers, and patients to have a clear understanding of the treatments and procedures and which illness covered by their policies.

Terima kasih. I hope this helps. I welcome your feedback and any suggestion.

Eh claim critical illness ‘Serangan jantung’ tak lepas.

“Eh doktor cakap saya kena serangan jantung, tapi tuntutan Penyakit Kritikal (Critical illness, CI) saya tak lepas. Apa ni wei. Bayar mahal.”

Ada antara anda yg mungkin keliru kenapa ini berlaku, tapi jawapannya ada dalam definisi serangan jantung polisi CI anda. Anda kena berhati-hati dan check polisi anda.

Kerana untuk penuhi syarat serangan jantung (myocardial infarct), anda perlu penuhi ketiga-tiga kriteria:

  1. Sakit dada
  2. Perubahan ECG
  3. Ujian darah jantung

3 jenis serangan jantung popular:

  1. STEMI
  2. Non-STEMI
  3. Unstable angina

No 1 & 2 biasanya penuhi ke tiga2 syarat. Tapi no 3. Unstable angina adalah sejenis serangan jantung di mana dua kriteria pertama dipenuhi, tetapi kriteria ketiga masih normal dan ia TIDAK termasuk dalam senarai penyakit kritikal.

Jom tengok contoh definasi serangan jantung dalam polisi CI yang ada kat Malaysia yg saya screen shot dari Internet — (disclaimer: mungkin polisi anda berbeza).

So jom tgk balik apa 3 kriteria tu.

  1. Sakit dada: Atau yang sewaktu dgn nya. Sebab kadang2 sakit tu mungkin tak tepat atas dada. Mungkin ia atas sikit kawasan perut perut atau kawasan leher.

Saya ‘sakit hati’, tapi jantung saya okay.

2. ECG: kena nampak luar biasa atau ada perubahan yang menunjukkan serangan jantung.

Tips: Perkataan ST dalam STEMI & non-STEMI – merujuk pada perubahan ECG.

3. Ujian darah: Tahap enzim darah jantung yang tinggi, biasanya dipanggil CKMB dan troponin. Yang ni banyak yang tak lepas. Sebab nilainya perlu tinggi untuk POSITIVE (abnormal) menunjuk kan ada otot jantung yang cedera. Maksudnya serangan tu major.

Jadi, ingatlah, semua tiga kotak semak perlu ditanda untuk tuntutan yang berjaya.Pokok pangkal fahami polisi anda. Benda ni bukan beli selalu.

Maka Sebelum beli polisi tanya agen anda.

Yang ikhlas,

Dr Beni

Rock your bodeh.

Exercise is good for you. That’s a no brainer.

No matter where you are, Summer in London or stuck in PJ during MCO 2.0 — you got to find a time for your body. American Heart Association recommends you (not sure to their 78 year-old President) to do at least 150 minutes per week of moderate intensity of aerobic activity and this could be as easy as brisk walking or berlari-anak or lenggang Mak Mah.

Should you wish to go faster you could do 75 minutes per week of vigorous aerobic activity. But don’t do y’all do it in one day, instead spread it throughout the week; and that could be as easy as 1/2 hour x 5 days of your week. That’s more than a fair amount to invest for your own bo-deh, comparing to the 9 HOURS you put in daily for your boss at his company.

I try to make this as regular as I could during this MCO 2.0. A perfect time to collect my thoughts quietly while getting my heartbeat within range of 120 to 150 bpm and thinking of a better ending for Rise of Skywalker which blatantly stole Captain Marvel and Avenger’s Endgame climax twist.

Me, trees and hopefully not the beginning of Breathe.